Search for: "B. v. O."
Results 381 - 400
of 8,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2023, 9:34 am
, a la sazón nuestro Jefe y abogado, qué, pregunté:"Que el Predio de "A" es el sirviente respecto del Predio de "B", ¿Por qué inquirió mi rubia amiga? [read post]
19 May 2023, 5:46 pm
Es decir, los fondos recompuestos pueden destinarse tanto a la seguridad jurídica de la tenencia, a las condiciones de habitabilidad de la vivienda, a la habilitación de obras públicas que permitan tener servicios básicos a dichas viviendas, a la adecuación cultural, entre otros componentes del derecho. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:20 am
[v] They also suggest that the breadth of the “associated person” definition might mean that employees/consultants/advisers of a subsidiary in a non-UK jurisdiction, are regarded as “associated persons” of the UK parent company. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:29 am
While it is correct that this is one ordinary meaning of the word “aqueduct”, another ordinary meaning given by the OED is a structure by which a canal is carried over a river. [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:41 pm
The term “controlled substance” means “a drug or other substance, or immediate precursor, included in schedule I, II, III, IV, or V of part B of this subchapter. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
Notably, she said the Court of Appeal considered that “[o]ther [read post]
14 May 2023, 4:00 am
Puisque la peine maximale pour cette infraction est passée de 5 à 10 ans en juillet 2015, l’accusé doit pouvoir bénéficier de la peine la moins sévère. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:54 pm
Stadnyk v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
For instance, in Smith v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
A prima facie inference of copying is raised when there is substantial similarity between the original work and the allegedly infringing work, together with proof o the possibility of access (IBCOS Computers Ltd v Barclays Finance Ltd [1994] FSR 275, p.296-297). [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm
(In this respect, Justice O’Connor in B v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Joan Biskupic also seems to have misread the import of Justice O'Connor's memo in Bush v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:50 am
Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:39 am
Passman v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 8:21 am
Louis N O and Others v Fenwick N O and Others (598/2021) [2023] ZASCA 59 (28 April 2023) [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:42 pm
Garretson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 5:23 pm
Apr. 25, 2023), the court examined 18 USC § 922(o)(1), which makes it unlawful to transfer or possess a machinegun, and 26 USC § 5845(b), the definition of a machinegun in the National Firearms Act. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 11:13 am
c) Los montos y/o porcentajes que cobren las AFP por los conceptos establecidos en los literales a) o d) del artículo 24 de la presente Ley, aplicables sobre la remuneración asegurable. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 3:23 pm
The lawsuit is here: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts v. [read post]
