Search for: "BRIGHT V US" Results 381 - 400 of 3,117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2014, 1:14 pm by Shawn R. Dominy
On the bright side, at least Ohio is not using “step out surveillance”. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:41 am by Viking
  His premise quite simply is that we are back to Ohio v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:07 pm
The buckle should rest perfectly centered under your chin.Adjust your side straps so the “V” sits perfectly below each ear.Additional ConcernsIt is best to choose a bright or colorful helmet for visibility purposes. [read post]
15 May 2009, 8:57 am by stu@crimapp.com
In Arizona v Gant, the Court overturned Belton in a 4-1-4 decision with Justice Scalia offering a critical view of the entire “officer safety rationale” used to justify these warrantless searches. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:21 am by Ilya Shapiro
The post Symposium: “Hey California, stop telling us what to say at work! [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 7:00 pm
In Nichols v City of Taft, the Fifth District Court of Appeal holds that the use of a fee multiplier to compensate for the higher hourly rates of out-of-town counsel requires a sufficient showing -- which the Nichols failed to make -- that hiring local counsel was "impracticable. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:17 pm
  They first got him to admit that he had been molested himself as a child, used that fact to purportedly empathize with his situation, and used his purported love for his daughter and care for her welfare to get him to admit to improper touching (and write a note apologizing). [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 11:04 am
Since it's a very interesting piece of work in its own right, I'll help Name That Tune by giving a fairly expansive snippet thereof:"Four months ago, in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Here is the citation:Mary Ware Dennett, 1913 (Credit: LC)"The Changing Face of Free Speech” uses the ACLU deliberations and litigation around the 1930 case of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 8:34 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
We disavow any use of such a bright-line rule and direct courts to carefully analyze whether dismissal would affect an asserted right. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:31 pm
It would be nice if the PA Supreme Court gave us a nice bright-line rule (like "2 weeks good, more than 2 weeks bad"), but that may be beyond the scope of review. [read post]