Search for: "BULL V US"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2012, 6:34 pm
” Crist v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 10:15 am
Red Bull GmbH v OHIM, Case T-78/13, is one of those decisions that is too small to give a whole blogpost to, but too interesting to ignore completely. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In response to the injunction in Texas v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 2:12 pm
., in the case of York University v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 11:19 am
In this very special episode Tamera and Gordon covered:The Slants (Trademark)Kirtsaeng (I & II) (Copyright)Raging Bull (Copyright)Aereo (Copyright)Lenz v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 11:19 am
In this very special episode Tamera and Gordon covered:The Slants (Trademark)Kirtsaeng (I & II) (Copyright)Raging Bull (Copyright)Aereo (Copyright)Lenz v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 8:18 pm
Sethi v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:13 pm
This judicial review of R(TRX) v Network Homes [2022] EWHC 456 (Admin) CO/3538/2021 is a useful restatement of the principles which apply in determining when decisions of Private Registered Providers of social housing (Housing Associations) can be judicially reviewed. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
Summary HMRC v Pendragon plc [2015] UKSC 37 gives tax advisers some useful guidance on when VAT planning will be viewed as an abusive practice, with any VAT advantage obtained through the planning being disallowed. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 4:11 am
Two Bulls (Property Law)Spirit Lake Tribe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:01 am
Music v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 12:59 pm
Outside of certain categories of speech, such as sexually themed speech, speech that could be school sponsored, or speech that arguably promotes drug use, the prevailing test courts use was set forth in Tinker, which requires “substantial disruption” from speech before it can be used a basis for discipline. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
The decision (which you can access here) is Case C-119/10 (Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:50 am
Schotte v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Because many of these recent articles come from the US, the focus has been on the copyright law of the US. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:05 am
12-14-2009 US Supreme Court Case: Docket: 08-1301 Issue: Whether a person may be criminally prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:45 am
The US Supreme Court issued their decision today in US v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 1:48 pm
V-6 engine had poor gas mileage. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
