Search for: "Baker v. People"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 11:26 am
In Lorenzo v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:02 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:05 pm
The state cannot allow non-religious people to follow their consciences but strictly enforce the law against religious people. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
For people like Mr. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:23 am
Instead, relying on Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
In Husted v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:13 am
I’m referring to Town of Greece v. [read post]
Symposium: The Masterpiece ruling calls for increased vigilance of discrimination in the marketplace
7 Jun 2018, 6:30 am
This week, the Supreme Court handed down a much-anticipated decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 8:36 am
Quoting West Virginia Board of Education v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:48 pm
We approach Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am
Windsor and Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 6:13 am
The Supreme Court has ruled that the Colorado Human Rights Commission denied a baker his religious rights in expressing hostility toward his religious beliefs in the course of determining whether he violated the rights of a gay couple in refusing to bake them a wedding cake.The case is Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm
In Hurley v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm
It made these determinations because, in the words of the Division, the requested cake included "wording and images [the baker] deemed derogatory," featured "language and images [the baker] deemed hateful," or displayed a message the baker "deemed as discriminatory, Jack v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
One is Ingersoll v. [read post]
