Search for: "Baker v. U.S. District Court"
Results 381 - 400
of 775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2022, 9:44 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in a challenge to a policy of expelling asylum-seekers at the border based on an obscure public health law. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 12:09 pm
District Court in as many days, the court in Tetris Holding, LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:54 am
This case was brought in federal court in the Central District of California. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:04 pm
The world today looks a lot different than it did when the Supreme Court decided Baker v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
Here's what he said:I want to say to you that there's a Supreme Court decision called Baker v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:52 pm
Branham & Baker Coal Co., 1992 U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
He was inducted into the U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
This court's decisions in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
District Court for the Northern District of California preliminarily enjoining in part the government's construction of a U.S. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
District Court for the Northern District of California preliminarily enjoining in part the government's construction of a U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:30 am
So perhaps the justices are beginning to catch up to the merits nature of many justiciability doctrines (although it seems to me there is a difference between a textual commitment to a branch other than the courts for Baker v. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm
” On the Cyberlaw Podcast, Stewart Baker interviewed FTC Commissioner Noah Phillips, Gus Hurwitz explained the cyber implications in the NDAA, and Matthew Heiman examined a circuit court split on insurance coverage of cyber-related losses. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
Press Controls (Patently-O) BPAI: Orita doctrine blocks patent reissue: Ex parte Gotto et al (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court W D Wisonsin: Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute do not violate appointments clause or take care clause of U.S. constitution: Hy Cite Corporation v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
This morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Merit Management Group v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 422-25 (2003); BMW v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 4:34 pm
The second common issue in the cases is the impact, if any, on the new cases of a 1972 Supreme Court decision, Baker v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
Related blog posts: U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia ruling that courts can review the decision-making process when the U.S. government decides to target an American citizen under the AUMF. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm
Paul Bedard of U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:45 am
District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
