Search for: "Ball v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2020, 12:58 pm
However, as the case of Summer J. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:00 pm
” (Miller v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:55 am
In Doe v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:10 pm
During soccer practice, Coleman tried to retrieve a ball from the soccer goals and jumped up to hang from the crossbar. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:39 am
” At the SMU Law Review Forum, Eric Mogilnicki and Alexander Schultz discuss a topic they deem lacking from the debate surrounding New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm
It is like introducing video appeals to tennis to make calls more accurate but allowing players a review only when balls are called "out" and not when a ball is called "in," no matter how erroneous the call seems. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:06 am
They just call balls and strikes. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:19 am
On February 13, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hold the appellate hearing in FTC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:58 pm
In Babb v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:03 pm
In other words, the number has to be downright insane.Prior to the CJEU's Huawei v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm
The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
But that includes the silliness of having the state fight about them. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 7:54 pm
Judgment was handed down on 22 November 2019 (Wagner v Nine Network Australia PL & Ors [2019] QSC 284). [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 3:12 pm
In an early case, 1984’s Southland Corp. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:28 pm
” See Kosinski v. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 10:21 am
And, as the Ohio Supreme Court stated in State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:02 pm
" Kimble v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 3:35 am
” United States v. [read post]
