Search for: "Bank of Delaware v. Bank of Delaware"
Results 381 - 400
of 937
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2016, 6:10 am
Endogenous Legal Traditions and Economic Outcomes Posted by Carmine Guerriero, University of Amsterdam, on Friday, April 22, 2016 Tags: Diversity, Efficiency, Financial Regulation, Globalization, International governance, Labor markets, Legal systems,Market efficiency, Social policies, Stakeholders Dieckman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:34 pm
Non-Assignment Clauses are Enforceable In Western Alliance Bank v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:31 am
Section 18-305 (c) of Delaware’s LLC Act has a similar provision, with one important difference: the Delaware provision authorizes the manager to withhold confidential information whether or not such authority is spelled out in the operating agreement. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:31 am
Section 18-305 (c) of Delaware’s LLC Act has a similar provision, with one important difference: the Delaware provision authorizes the manager to withhold confidential information whether or not such authority is spelled out in the operating agreement. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:31 am
Section 18-305 (c) of Delaware’s LLC Act has a similar provision, with one important difference: the Delaware provision authorizes the manager to withhold confidential information whether or not such authority is spelled out in the operating agreement. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:16 am
(Some of us noticed that the SG did not weigh in regarding Caulkett v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm
Although the rule insulates the decision makers from ordinary negligence,[7] it can typically be overcome by a showing of gross negligence.[8] States may differ in whether the rule applies to both directors and officers (e.g., Delaware[9]), only to directors (e.g., Florida[10]), or only to “outside” directors (e.g., California[11]). [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Freed, Center for Political Accountability, on Friday, February 26, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Last year also saw Delaware decisions that are likely to change the landscape of M&A litigation and interesting developments in the area of SEC enforcement. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:00 am
In Amalgamated Bank v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Defendants had no in-state offices, real estate, were not registered to do business, had no address, phone numbers, bank accounts, or employees.Google Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 5:01 am
In the recent decision of Amalgamated Bank v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 8:33 pm
Amalgamated Bank v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:00 am
Amalgamated Bank v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court was not amused. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:07 am
Mirvis, Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz, on Tuesday, January 26, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Class actions, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Delaware cases, Delaware law,Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Materiality, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Proxy materials, Settlements, Shareholder value Negotiation in Good Faith—SIGA v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Rosof, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Thursday, January 21, 2016 Tags: Acquisitions, Bank loans, Banks, Buyouts, Capital markets, Credit supply, External financing, Financing conditions,Leverage, Leveraged acquisitions, Mergers & acquisitions, Restructurings [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
