Search for: "Banks v. Fair"
Results 381 - 400
of 3,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 5:21 am
McAtee v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:48 pm
Klein (University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law) has posted Martin V. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 4:37 am
In Jerman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 4:37 am
In Jerman v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
In Jesinoski v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:08 am
In Fortunato v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:21 am
The recent case of Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13 clarified the English law position that a principal cannot be vicariously liable for the acts of an independent contractor. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:53 am
The report was requested by two Democratic members of the Senate Banking Committee, Chairman Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:03 am
”The decision references a number of relevant cases, including the New Brunswick Court of Appeal’s 1983 ruling in Federal Business Development Bank v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 4:49 am
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., 2007 WL 1521525 (E.D. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 6:00 pm
As just one example, in Backpage.com, LLC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2016, 3:11 am
The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) doesn’t authorize this kind of offsetting for overtime compensation, the court ruled, citing its 2005 precedential holding in Wheeler v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 2:15 pm
In Hamilton v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:48 pm
[Ed. note -- Jon asked me to step in for a few days while he's out of the office.]United States v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 6:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:39 am
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, a child is entitled to a fair and appropriate public education. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:39 am
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, a child is entitled to a fair and appropriate public education. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:24 pm
Fair enough. [read post]
13 May 2007, 8:33 pm
BNA is reporting on Koehler v. [read post]