Search for: "Barnes v. House" Results 381 - 400 of 477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 6:35 am by James Bickford
  Kagan advised Justice Marshall to vote to deny cert. in DeShaney v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Ethics and Privacy the results of a comprehensive study [pdf] into Canadian privacy law making 19 recommendations. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Lee v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 8:06 am by familoo
Hat tip to @byron_barrister whose much more moderate tweets sent me galloping off to the Daily Mail angry barn. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:18 am by INFORRM
With his wife Carolyn, the hospitality dispensed at their house in Barnes to all ages was legendary, as was their gift for almost invariably conjuring perfect weather. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Cruz-Rodriguez, No. 052492, 052493 Convictions and sentences of twenty-six defendants for crimes arising from their involvement in a large drug distribution network that operated in a Puerto Rico housing project are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient; 2) the evidence failed to implicate one defendant in any conspiracy; 3) the evidence implicated a defendant in a conspiracy different from the one charged; and 4) district court committed a host of errors,… [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:13 am by Beth Graham
Barnes & Noble, 763 F.3d 1171, 1175-76 (9th Cir. 2014)); see also, Van Tassell v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
We were impressed with reader response we had to the 50-state survey we did not too long ago on informal defense communication with treating physicians, so we've decided to present the medical monitoring issue in a similar fashion.The questions before the house are what states have adopted medical monitoring, which have rejected it, and what quirks are there? [read post]