Search for: "Barnes v. Washington"
Results 381 - 400
of 999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2011, 6:22 am
” Barnes discusses the pending petition in Williams v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:42 pm
One might think that such a concession is effectively no different than a guilty plea, and the decision whether to plead guilty is fundamental one for the defendant and not counsel (Jones v Barnes, 463 U.S. 745 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468 [1989]). [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:39 am
Adam Liptak of the New York Times has coverage of the opinion, as do Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Peter Urban of Arkansas News, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, and Reuters. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
Barnes & Noble 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe Facebook’s “Browsewrap” Enforced Against Kids–EKD v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Gobain Ceramics v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 6:53 am
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that "Issue of contraceptive coverage returns to Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 4:44 am
In today's edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined "Alabama minority redistricting case seems to divide Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:16 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that "Justices say it's enough to cite terrorism in declining visa applicant. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 5:55 am
State of Washington, (9th Cir.,, Oct. 15, 2018), the 9th Circuit held that the district court properly dismissed an inmate's 1st Amendment and RLUIPA claims regarding burning of his hair.In Ahdom v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am
Capato, in which the Court unanimously held that children conceived after their father’s death qualify for Social Security survivors benefits only if state intestacy law permits them to inherit from their father; Robert Barnes of the Washington Post also covers the case. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:02 am
” In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes offers “a reminder of the real people behind the court’s cases” with a profile of Jason Pepper, the petitioner in Pepper v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
” Other stories addressing the prospect that the Supreme Court will review the case come from Robert Barnes of the Washington Post and Peter Henderson and Dan Levine at Reuters. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
Holzum v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am
Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am
Lyle Denniston reported on the oral argument for us, with other coverage coming from Robert Barnes of The Washington Post and Jaclyn Belczyk for JURIST. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:25 am
CNN’s Bill Mears notes that the oral arguments “stayed away from the specifics of the crime and subsequent trial,” and while Robert Barnes of the Washington Post similarly observes that “drama was missing” from the “technical” arguments. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
CNN’s Bill Mears writes that “[i]t was clear the high court struggled over precisely how the federal statute should be interpreted”; moreover, as the Washington Post’s Bob Barnes notes, the case produced an unexpected line-up: “[Preemption] questions often divide the court on ideological grounds, but in this case, liberal Justice Stephen G. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:35 am
Additional coverage of the argument in Ayestas comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
Joan Biskupic of USA Today, Ariane de Vogue of ABC News, and Robert Barnes of the Washington Post all preview the case. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
Robert Barnes of the Washington Post notes that the cases “come before a court that traditionally has been sympathetic to business interests, but is sensitive about recent criticism from the left” regarding perceived corporate favoritism. [read post]
