Search for: "Barr v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2023, 3:42 pm
§ 371 makes it illegal for two more people to "conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
” Powell also pointed to two cases, Barr v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 10:28 am
The language of “particularized need” comes from United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 9:12 am
Just this week, when faced with another binding directive to decide a different appeal "with appropriate dispatch," Barr v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
United States, 434 F.3d 1359, 1368 (Fed. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
Barr, 18-725, involves a fairly arcane question of immigration law. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:15 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, about whether that agency’s administrative law judges are “officers” of the United States under the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
United States and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Spending over six pages detailing United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:11 am
General Global Fund calls upon drug companies to ‘share without delay’ AIDS drug patents with the Medicines Patent Pool (KEI) Sharing US drug patents with neglected patients: A scientist’s view (IP Watch) Statement of the United States to WTO TRIPS Council on the Paragraph 6 System (KEI) Remarks by UNAIDS Secretariat and on behalf of UNDP: Capacity building on the Paragraph 6 System and related TRIPS flexibilities (KEI) Seed patents and biodiversity (Patent… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:40 am
Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
PaulkAmicus brief of the Government Accountability ProjectPetitioner's reply Title: Barr v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 6:28 pm
But in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:42 am
While the VICP does not cover all vaccines (the COVID-19 vaccines are among a variety of vaccines that are excluded), it covers most vaccines that the CDC recommends for routine administration to children and adults in the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am
United States, in which the court held that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 3:32 am
Finally, he noted that Justice Barrett in 2021 (Barr v. [read post]
