Search for: "Barris v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The Sao Paulo location is the second overseas office for 700-lawyer Proskauer, which has seven offices in the United States and one in Paris. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am by lsammis
Lion Laboratories Limited – Sister Company to CMI, Inc The most likely candidate seems to be Lion Laboratories Limited, based in Barry, Wales, United Kingdom. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
Gregory The Significance of Sprint/United Management Company v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information, “involves the privacy implications of our rapidly evolving use of technology in the digital age — and the need for our laws to evolve in tandem. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
FDR succeeded in that respect (even if Barry Cushman’s no-switch analysis of Justice Roberts is correct). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:01 am by Nabiha Syed
Briefly: At Dorf on Law, Mike Dorf focuses on another of last Thursday’s decisions:  United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:33 pm by Ilya Somin
In that context, banning child labor often ends up hurting poor families rather than helping them, as I explained here: By modern standards, the United States in 1918 was a very poor society. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
Zoe Tillman of the Blog of Legal Times reports that Antoine Jones, the defendant in last Term’s GPS tracking case, United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:43 am by Steve Hall
The New Jersey Supreme Court appointed a Special Master to review the legal standard for the admissibility of eyewitness testimony known as the “Manson test,” established by the United States Supreme Court in 1977 and fully embraced by 48 out of 50 states, including New Jersey in 1988 in State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
The South East Counter Terrorism Unit used a Production Order under the Terrorism Act to obtain the laptop after he interviewed a British-born Islamic State fighter. [read post]