Search for: "Bates v. AT"
Results 381 - 400
of 980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
It ditched the lower court's strange interpretation of some language in Bates v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:33 pm
On 13 January 2016, there is an application in the case of Weston v Bates and on 15 January 2016 an application in the case of McGrath v Bedford. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
One v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
In Shirley Frazier Burrell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 10:55 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:11 am
All parties concerned will no doubt be awaiting the Supreme Court’s judgment with bated breath. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:34 am
See also Bates v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:19 pm
Gill v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm
Bates Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 09a0013p.06 USA v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm
Bates Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 09a0013p.06 USA v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 6:20 am
In Judge Bates’ ruling on April 2 (see this post), he concluded that the Supreme Court’s decision last June in Boumediene v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
’U.S. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:35 am
Alta Bates Hospital (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 208, 215. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
ROGER BATES, MICHAEL L. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:46 am
Bates, 147 S.W.3d 264, 269 (Tex. 2004); see also Burditt v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
, 116 AD3d at 821, quoting Bates v Long Is. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
JESSICA PARKER VALENTINE AND BRYAN L. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:05 pm
The Dallas Court of Appeals bought mother's simplistic argument: If you live in the same place you did ten years ago, there could be no material or substantial change of circumstances no matter where else you lived, or what else happened, in the meantime.The Dallas court cited to, but did not follow, the analysis in, Bates v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 5:19 am
The claims in Bates v. [read post]
