Search for: "Battle v. Georgia" Results 381 - 400 of 485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2010, 5:47 am by David G. Badertscher
Supreme Court's decision this year limiting the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am by Marie Louise
(PatLit) The Stig can be ‘outed’ – official – BBC loses battle over Ben Collins book (IPKat) Time for that IP Tsar? [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:58 am by Lyle Denniston
The Supreme Court on Monday put an end to a running battle between a California lawyer — a prominent figure in the movement to challenge the legitimacy of Barack Obama’s Presidency — and a federal judge in Georgia. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Kelly
Raymond Ltd loses trademark battle (Spicy IP) Of Madrid and Madras (IPKat) India’s oldest trademark? [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:30 pm by Douglas Reiser
This is a battle that many a construction attorney has had to battle. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
World Pac Int'l AG (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court N D Georgia: ITC deterimination of invalidity does not relieve obligations under earlier settlement and consent decree admitting validity of patent: Tillotson Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Henley, Don – Henley, DeVore file reply briefs in ‘parody’ battle (Copyrights & Campaigns)   US Trademarks 50% successful with jus tertii defense: Golden Temple of Oregon, LLC v Wai Lana Productions, LLC and United Food Imports, Inc v Baroody Imports, Inc (Property, intangible) ‘Fraud and the TTAB: What hath Bose wrought? [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:34 am by Will
These plaintiffs brought claims under Georgia law for design defect, manufacturing defect, failure to warn, and implied warranty. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:40 am by Adam Chandler
Based on Justice Scalia’s questions in last week’s argument in Doe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 They worry that the Supreme Court could hand their movement a serious setback by issuing a neutral or worse, an anti-gay, decision along the lines of the 1986 Bowers v Hartwick decision (upholding a Georgia sodomy law on the basis there was no constitutional protection for sexual privacy). [read post]