Search for: "Bird v Bird"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,955
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
The techniques used in scientific research are extraordinarily diverse, from counting sheep and watching birds to detecting quasars and creating quarks. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:16 pm
§48 in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:16 pm
§48 in the case of United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Early Bird Standard = £510 Early Bird Group Ticket / IBIL Sponsor / UCL alumni = £433.50 Standard fee = £600 Standard Group Ticket / IBIL Sponsor / UCL alumni = £510 More information: here Fashion Law Seminar: Common Law v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 07239-19 Heneghan v coventrytelegraph.net, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 05741-19 Grant and Pitts v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 01212-19 Ashley v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach- after investigation Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 24 October 2019 there was a statement in open court [pdf] in the case of Morgan… [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm
At its largest, Atwell’s flock exceeded fifty-five birds. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Under Addington v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 2:26 am
Have the Royal Marines Commando really got a commercial interest in bird tables (class 20)? [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
That year, it held in Bowers v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 10:47 am
On appeal in Simon v. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 9:39 pm
In Bhattacharjee v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
Seize the Day – customs & border control was moderated by Manon Rieger-Jansen, Bird & Bird, who set the stage by describing the ubiquitousness of counterfeits in 2019 and the global scope of the problem. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
Jessica will be joined by co-panelists Mimi Hu Brouillette of Greenberg Traurig and Daniel Jarcho of Alston & Bird to discuss these important topics: What are the practical implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in Kisor v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
In her FTC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 5:38 am
Yes there are: for certain kinds of pheasants; migratory birds of the family Anatidae (ducks, geese, and swans); and “nonnative wild animals that are harmful wild animals. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 4:17 pm
Other notable revisions to the concept of critical habitat include changes that address the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:11 am
I did not blog about the case, but I had some interesting email exchanges about the case, including how it interacted with last Term's Nieves v. [read post]
