Search for: "Black v. Territory" Results 381 - 400 of 504
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2012, 9:50 am by Rick St. Hilaire
  Odyssey lost the case, and the case now captioned as Odyssey Marine Exploration v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm by KC Johnson
John Hope Franklin, whose legacy Arcidiacono treads upon, provided research for Thurgood Marshall in the Brown v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:53 am by The Book Review Editor
Ali Soufan’s recent book, The Black Banners: The Inside Story of 9/11 and the War Against al-Qaeda (written in conjunction with Daniel Freedman), has attracted a good deal of attention since its release a few months ago. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:01 am
The public interest litigation relating to black money (Ram Jethmalani v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 12:03 pm by Susan Brenner
Kincaid's gang was not a T.L.F. rival, nor was Kincaid riding in territory claimed by T.L.F. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The PCC also published the following “resolved” cases on 25 November: Sir Alan Davies Daily Mail, Clause 10; Kenneth Brewster The Sun, Clause 1; Adam Bradford The Star (Sheffield), Clause 1; Karen Coleman Brentwood Gazette, Clause 1; CLEAR The Sun, Clause 1; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mail, Clause 5; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mirror, Clause 5; Lord Triesman The Mail on Sunday, Clauses 1, 3 and 10; Resolved – London Borough of Sutton v Sutton [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
(Prior IntLawGrrls posts available here.)Scholars have called for the International Criminal Court to proactively use the threat of ICC jurisdiction to press states parties to prosecute crimes committed in their territory. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:04 am by Benjamin Wittes
After winning a statutory right to habeas in Rasul v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]