Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 10,125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
(Kelly M Greenhill, "When migrants become weapons: The long history and worrying future of a coercive tactic," MIT Center for International Studies (March/April 2022))While our focus is on the current use of the tactic by Russia in the context of its imperial adventurism; it ought to be considered as well as a tactic of equalizing power where smaller states seek concessions from larger and potentially opposing states (e.g., "Nicaragua is ‘weaponizing’… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
While is why the Sixth Circuit (over a dissent) just applied Chevron and Rust v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am by Sasha Volokh
But the constraints on public prosecutors, which we saw in connection with United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
There, a judge held that chemical giant du Pont was bound by legal determinations made in three trials involving the discharge of acid into the Ohio River. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:33 am by Dennis Crouch
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
The state of Florida, and all executive branch officials, are not bound by stare decisis. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Independent Contractor Hired on Fixed Term Renewable Contract In Elder v Max Wright Real Estate, Mr. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Independent Contractor Hired on Fixed Term Renewable Contract In Elder v Max Wright Real Estate, Mr. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  They made no distinction between an officer, which included the president, an officer of the United States, and an officer under the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
In its application, Canadian Pacific asserted that the arbitrator had overstepped his bounds when he decided that policy 1804 was void and of no force or effect. [read post]