Search for: "Britain v. Britain" Results 381 - 400 of 1,456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2014, 10:21 am by Gritsforbreakfast
’” According to Adams, Otis’s speech was “the first scene of the first act of opposition to the arbitrary claims of Great Britain. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:38 pm
An interesting historical example of disinheritance involved the former king of Great Britain, Edward VIII, who succeeded his father, King George V, in January 1936. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm by Christine Corcos
First, the Article looks at how the Constitution impacted Douglass and how Douglass was himself a “constitutional actor,” even though he held no public office and was not even considered a U.S. citizen under the holding in Dred Scott v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:24 am by Howard Friedman
In Britain today, a 2-judge panel of the England and Wales High Court rejected a challenge by a Jewish human rights group to anti-Israel resolutions passed by three local councils. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 8:06 am by Mark Keenan
So if you want to rely on a separation as a fact for your divorce, you are going to have to say, you do not share anything at anytime which in modern day Britain is impossibility. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 9:02 am by Magdaleen Jooste
  LES Britain & Ireland’s Online Annual Conference 2020 themed “Becoming Investor Ready” is taking place on 3 November 2020. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:04 am by Christine Corcos
First, the Article looks at how the Constitution impacted Douglass and how Douglass was himself a “constitutional actor,” even though he held no public office and was not even considered a U.S. citizen under the holding in Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:04 am
First, the Article looks at how the Constitution impacted Douglass and how Douglass was himself a “constitutional actor,” even though he held no public office and was not even considered a U.S. citizen under the holding in Dred Scott v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
This Article also explores our understanding of the Constitution and its relationship to slavery through the lens of Frederick Douglass.First, the Article looks at how the Constitution impacted Douglass and how Douglass was himself a "constitutional actor," even though he held no public office and was not even considered a U.S. citizen under the holding in Dred Scott v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
A long-running saga came to an end at the High Court in London on 7 October 2011, in Adelson v Anderson [2011] EWHC 2497 (QB). [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 5:25 am by SHG
Great Britain has decided to pardon the dead. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 5:00 am by Cori Crider
In the U.K., rendition has been unlawful since at least 2000 (R v Mullen). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:54 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
  In Yacht Management Company Ltd v Gordon the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a decision of the Employment Tribunal, that there were numerous factors to support the Tribunal’s conclusion that it had jurisdiction to hear a claim of unfair dismissal brought by the employee because the seafarer’s “base” was her home in Aberdeen, Great Britain despite the fact that her “tours of duty” on the yacht all began and ended outside Great… [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and another v Ahmed and another, heard 20th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 Secretary of State for Transport v Curzon Park Ltd and… [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:45 am by CMS
Their position had, as its foundation, the case of Williams v Network Rail [2018] EWCA Civ 1514, [2019] QB 601. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
The grant of a privacy injunction in the case of AMC v News Group Newspapers ([2015] EWHC 2361 (QB)) has unleashed a deluge of largely inaccurate media comment worthy of the “super injunction spring” of 2011. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:07 pm
United Kingdom (1996) on "diplomatic assurances" and torture, and the more recent Saadi v. [read post]