Search for: "Buck v State"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:38 am
Ted Olson and David Boies, who fought opposing sides of Bush v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 9:26 am
In other words, if the state of the case law was fuzzy at the time, the defendants win the case since they cannot be expected to know the state of the law the way a law professor or some other legal expert would. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 4:17 am
Last May in Buck v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:45 am
See Buck v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:23 am
” @ThirdTierAmie Buck v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:16 pm
Fireside Bank v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 8:39 am
Decisions over who gets busted and who doesn't affect large numbers of medical pioneers, average smokers, and make-a-buck dope dealers alike. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:49 am
Trump’s Administration stated that the Obama guidance was inconsistent with the language of Title IX and that the issue should be left to the states. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 1:59 am
Compare Missouri v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:36 pm
They pump big bucks and lots of associate time into the cases. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:58 pm
The decision reverses a district court’s dismissal, sending the case, Mohamed v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:55 pm
Regarding legal persons, the Court has consistently held that a legal person’s business premises (Buck v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
You may not have heard of the lawsuit Hurrell-Harring v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:15 pm
As the Supreme Court said in Hall v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:15 pm
As the Supreme Court said in Hall v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court weighed in in 1927, in the notorious case of Buck v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:30 am
While no instrument explicitly uses race as a “risk factor” (which in any event is probably barred by the Supreme Court’s decision in Buck v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
The Eleventh Circuit’s August decision in Cruz v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:29 pm
The industry petitioners in Michigan v. [read post]
