Search for: "Burger v. Judge" Results 381 - 400 of 492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
United States broadly read judges’ power to order restitution (a “conservative” outcome) by a majority of Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor, over the dissent of Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, and Kennedy. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm by James Bickford
As for Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Expects a roadmap from Judge Chin for an acceptable settlement within the framework of class action law. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
The reality is that there was very little in the way of positive rules and procedures to govern such cases until 1948 at the earliest, and even through the 1970s and 1980s, when the Burger and Rehnquist Courts superimposed a series of procedural exhaustion, default, and waiver requirements primarily as a matter of judge-made law. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:03 pm by Brandon Bartels
Chief Justice Warren famously sought, and attained, consensus on perhaps the most important Supreme Court decision, Brown v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Dustcontrol International (EPLAW)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): Infringement action won't be stayed pending foreign decision in non-patent claim: Elmotech Ltd & Anor v Guidance Ltd & Anor (PatLit)   United States US General Director Kappos testimony to Congress (Patently-O) Judge Michel: USPTO should receive $1 billion infusion of cash (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) The US Reporting on IPRs - the Watch List (IP tango) Industrial design in Canada and US -… [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
(Black had served briefly as a police court judge in Alabama.) [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:52 am by John Bursch
  For example, I was never even asked about Roe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:12 am by Kashmir Hill
The DC Dicta blog tore the Supremes a new one for their lack of tech savvy during the sexty City of Ontario v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:01 pm
“She will not be apples”, a neat post on iPOD v DOPi, is that rare blawg’s only article this year. [read post]