Search for: "Butts v State" Results 381 - 400 of 660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On the same day judgment was handed down in the case of R (on the application of Jefferies & Ors) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin). [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Butts & Johnson, Sentinel Insurance Company administered by The Hartford, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:52 am by SHG
But § 1983 only applies to state actors. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:14 am by John L. Welch
Smith states that she "had always been remembered amongst associates as the Georgia Peach with the perfect butt. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am by Tobias Thienel
Occidental Exploration and Production Co. [2005] EWCA 1116, [2006] 2 WLR 70; the quotation is from Lord Wilberforce’s speech in Buttes Gas Oil Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Turning to detainee news: Wells reported the much awaited DC panel decision in the Guantanamo force-feeding case, Aamer v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:20 pm by Patrick
United States and its progeny Debs v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 6:36 pm
The Supreme Court said so in Furman v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am by SHG
Rodriguez kicked butt on the rights issue, but the remedy didn’t go nearly as well, due to Davis v. [read post]