Search for: "C v. B" Results 381 - 400 of 22,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2017, 12:19 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 04372 (1st Dept., 2017) the Appellate Division held that Plaintiff’s brief testimony that a piano was gifted to him during the marriage did not suffice to overcome the marital property presumption; thus, the court properly deemed the piano marital property to be sold and the net proceeds divided equally between the parties (see DRL § 236[B][1][c]; Bernard v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:19 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 04372 (1st Dept., 2017) the Appellate Division held that Plaintiff’s brief testimony that a piano was gifted to him during the marriage did not suffice to overcome the marital property presumption; thus, the court properly deemed the piano marital property to be sold and the net proceeds divided equally between the parties (see DRL § 236[B][1][c]; Bernard v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:49 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Ohio Rule of Evidence 612 indicates that Except as otherwise provided in criminal proceedings by Rules 16(B)(1)(g) and 16(C)(1)(d) of Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure, if a witness uses a writing to refresh memory for the... [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 4:23 pm
As I wrote in my most recent post, Fuchs v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:22 am
State of Indiana, a 5-page opinion, Judge Kirsch writes:Henry Cunningham was convicted and sentenced for confinement1 as a Class B felony and battery as a Class C felony. [read post]
24 May 2016, 8:10 am by Char;es Abit
What is the impact of (a) retirement, (b) Social Security and (c) Medicare on the obligation of the 72-year old ex-husband to continue alimony payments to the ex-wife? [read post]
24 May 2016, 8:10 am by Char;es Abit
What is the impact of (a) retirement, (b) Social Security and (c) Medicare on the obligation of the 72-year old ex-husband to continue alimony payments to the ex-wife? [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:39 pm by PaulKostro
Second, the court shall determine the portion of the fee recoverable after applying the factors under Rule 5:3-5(c), RPC 1.5(a), and Rule 4:42-9(b). [read post]