Search for: "C. Paul Smith" Results 381 - 400 of 622
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2012, 4:59 am by Rob Robinson
  bit.ly/HzXpGZ (Joshua Engel) Communications with Unretained Experts, Unprotected by Rule 26(b)(B)(4)(C) – Any Exceptions? [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm by P.J. Blount
Dezember 2011 in der Rechtssache C-366/10 betreffend das Vorabentscheidungsersuchen nach Art. 267 AEUV, eingereicht vom High Court of Justice (England und Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) (Vereinigtes Königreich), mit Entscheidung vom 8. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
One of the key responses to Berger was the publication of The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding by Paul Brest in 1980. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
Charvet, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, New Orleans LA; David C. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
In light of the no-contact order, on August 11, 2008 the parents placed the children in the care of their "maternal step-aunt and uncle", Robin S. and Paul S., who were respondents in appeal No. 2. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:10 pm by Jeff Gamso
  And they sued Shelley Smith who gave them each a D. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
McEwen* Introduction In the article included in the Stein McEwen Newsletter entitled Overview of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act: What Is The Practical Effect of First-to-File for Patent Applicants (October 2011), the novelty portions of the American Invents Act were explored. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:30 am by Dennis Crouch
§122(e) – found in Section 8 of the AIA [Leahy Smith America Invents Act]. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:05 am by Chris Castle
Even so, Chairman Smith has amended the SOPA bill to include the following language: (5) NO IMPACT ON SECURITY OR INTEGRITY. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm by Danny Jacobs
Judge dismisses conspiracy count in Schurick robocall case — by Steve Lash To the prosecution, the most damning evidence that Paul E. [read post]