Search for: "C.A."
Results 381 - 400
of 5,791
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Kirsch, C.A. 2017-0147-SG (October 1, 2018) As this decision points out, if a non-compete agreement conditions its enforcement on the employer’s performance of its end of the bargain, then a failure to do so renders the non-compete unenforceable. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 6:02 am
Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, C.A. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:49 pm
., C.A. 7705-CC (September 16, 2009). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:41 pm
., C.A. 5233-VCP (April 30, 2012) This is an interesting appraisal case because it explains the issues dealing with valuing a smaller company. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
O’Neil, C.A. 12403-VCMR (August 9, 2017) This decision explains what needs to be alleged to state a fraud claim. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 3:46 am
Portnoy, C.A. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 8:42 am
., C.A. [read post]
2 May 2007, 1:06 pm
., C.A. 1554-CC (May 2, 2007). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
., C.A. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 7:55 pm
In re Seneca Investment LLC, C.A. 3624-CC (Del. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:44 pm
., C.A. 2369-VCN (June 25, 2009) Class action settlements often have a claim procedure that is complicated. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 6:54 pm
Hillman, C.A. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
., C.A. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 4:54 pm
Araneta, C.A. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 7:00 am
Crawford, C.A. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:44 pm
Siniscalchi, C.A. 2874-VCN (January 31, 2011) When personal jurisdiction over a defendant is challenged, the plaintiff has the right to take limited "jurisdictional discovery. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 11:34 pm
., C.A. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:00 am
Ajio LLC, C.A. 11895-VCG (May 13, 2016) This is another in a line of decisions that explains when the issue of arbitrability should be sent to the arbitrator to decide. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 8:44 am
Silkroad Equity LLC, C.A. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
., C.A. 9700-CB (February 15, 2018) In what it is hoped is the final act in the TransPerfect case, this decision upholds the sale process used by the Custodian to sell TransPerfect. [read post]