Search for: "CAMPBELL v. STATE" Results 381 - 400 of 2,234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 4:50 pm by Shahram Miri
Or the litigant could live in Campbell, a city located in the same county as the superior court, i.e. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 7:22 am by Jennifer Lang-Hodge
The BCCA declined to embark on any such analysis, stating simply that it was “bound by Campbell River”. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:30 am by admin
Campbell, 146 Mich App 295; 380 N.W.2d 88 (1985); City of Detroit v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 6:05 pm by Kantor & Kantor LLP
The rule emanates from a judicially created doctrine dating back to at least 1963, when the California Supreme Court decided Campbell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:09 am by Laura C. Baucus and Samantha L. Walls
The Sixth Circuit issued the first appellate decision interpreting §1024.41 in Campbell v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
Campbell was understandably unwilling to address the thorny issue of whether use of an EU mark in one member state is enough to establish a reputation in the EU for the purposes of Article 9(2)(b) so simply considered this issue from the point of view of the UK mark. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
In Foskett, Peters and Waschckuhn v Ezeugo [2018] EWHC 3694 (QB), three Judges applied for the committal to prison of a man who had repeatedly breached a harassment injunction made in their favour. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:53 pm by Ben
The intricacies of the matter are not present in the public domain and hence an accurate analysis would be tough to construe, however I would like to point out to the case of Campbell v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
What does Brexit mean for data protection: part 2 The Panopticon Blog has a post about the case of Campbell v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2018] UKUT 372 (AAC) – Death and the DPA. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 8:28 pm by Richard Hunt
Winchester Campbell Properties, LLC, 2018 WL 6619940, at *4 (N.D. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 8:55 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The law is not as clear in Maine, as the state’s highest court has not adopted the Luhrmann standard, and in fact a 2013 Maine Superior Court ruling rejected the standard in Campbell v. [read post]