Search for: "CREWS V US" Results 381 - 400 of 1,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2020, 6:09 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Aside from the tax issue addressed herein (and people used to say 1/3 for the husband, 1/3 for the wife and 1/3 for the government – though the numbers never actually worked that way), what is the justification for giving the income earner more than the recipient in light of Crews v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 6:23 am
To begin with, he notes that "[t]he availability of fair use for sexually-themed works has had a mixed reception in the courts," describing a number of cases - including DC Comics Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 9:29 am by Peter Hirtle
  Kenny Crews has a useful post on how its implications may not be terrible for libraries. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:19 pm by Maritime Blogger
The Coast Guard contracted the FDS to locate and examine the wreck of the 70-foot F/V Lady Cecilia using a remote operating vehicle, which discovered it in approximately 460-feet of water on Sunday. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:35 am by Sheppard Mullin
In a recent decision having broad implications for employers, the First Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal in Seymore v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 7:39 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“The National Security Archive et. al. v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 8:17 am by Gabrielle Wast
The Second Circuit explained that groups’ reliance on a two-part test from the Supreme Court case of US Dept. of Justice v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:11 am
Thanks to Bob Lawless and the crew at Credit Slips for this opportunity for the guest blogger spot for the next week. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am by Mikhaila Fogel
VanLandingham dug into the Edward Gallagher case and former Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:55 am
[One man is v]aping while saying things like, “I will fuck you to death if you don’t sing. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
"  The historians' brief in the Emoluments Clause case, CREW v. [read post]