Search for: "CUSTODY OF S C" Results 381 - 400 of 4,825
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2021, 2:50 pm by Steve Kalar
For an interesting discussion on Kim’s role in other Mirandajurisprudence, see Daniel C. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 2:45 pm
Earlier this week, a driver hit several parked cars in San Diego’s East Village. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm by familoo
Subsequently, this afternoon Mostyn J’s decision authorising the delivery of the child by means of c-section was published. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 12:47 pm
"  Also, Texas Family Code section 102.006(c) now permits most of these persons to seek custody of a child when the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services has terminated the parental rights of the child's parents, provided suit is filed within ninety days of termination. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:05 am by Eugene Volokh
["][T]he [c]ourt finds by clear and convincing evidence that the need for stability and continuity in [ ] Child's life is sufficient to overcome the presumption …["] [T]he record supports the trial court's conclusion that the factors weighed evenly between the parties. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:10 am
The language used to summon Manning was not indicative of someone in custody. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 9:36 am by gstasiewicz
As Judicial Watch noted in its FOIA lawsuit, these are the two offices within HHS most likely to have custody of the requested records. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 5:30 am
Phillips, 468 F.3d 1264, 1266 (10th Cir. 2006) (holding that DNA evidence, obtained pursuant to a search warrant, was admissible despite fact that supporting affidavit relied on a defendant's statements offered in a custodial environment without a Miranda warning). [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 10:28 am by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Custody Lawyer said the issue in this case is whether the neglect petition pursuant to Family Court Act § 1051(c) and a fact-finding determination should be granted. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:00 am by koherston
The trial court denied the petition and directed that physical custody of the child be given to Intended Parents. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 9:01 am by Jill Fitzgerald
Parents cannot negotiate away a child’s rights to support, so parents also cannot negotiate away the ability to modify a child support or custody order, should circumstances warrant.On the other hand, if parties agree that alimony should not be modified, the Pennsylvania Courts will enforce that provision. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]