Search for: "California v. EPA" Results 381 - 400 of 682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 1:55 pm by WIMS
Consequently, the emissions that may result from the consumptive burning of North Baja gas are not reasonably foreseeable within the definition provided by the EPA's regulations. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Packert Trustee Chair in Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law, discussed how the Sackett v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm by Hugh Rennie
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 6:06 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer also will retain a consultant to review its employment policies and practices (Wellens v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:08 am by Vicki Shiah
  New York State, which supports the Tailoring Rule, has been joined in the motion to intervene by California, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. [read post]