Search for: "California v. Russell"
Results 381 - 400
of 750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
Yesterday, in Trump v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am
The first is McWilliams v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
Regents of the University of California. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 2:10 pm
Golan v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm
At issue in Schuette v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
Harris 13-1313Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome, USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries - in this case, foie gras - based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California's borders. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
His dormant commerce clause decisions demonstrated this tendency: Whether it was a solid waste processing company challenging a municipal ordinance (C & A Carbone) or a California winery challenging state limits on alcohol distribution (Granholm v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:00 pm
" (Disclaimer: Howe & Russell and Akin Gump represent the respondent in this case). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm
But, they are required by law to do so under a United States Supreme Court case, Brady v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Iskanian, 14-341 allows us to linger a bit longer in California. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
In Koontz v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:51 am
Arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm
In Mellouli v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Ayala, in which the Court declined to give a new trial to a California death-row inmate. [read post]
