Search for: "California v. Super. Ct."
Results 381 - 400
of 499
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2011, 4:08 pm
Super. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:30 am
Super. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:07 am
Super Ct., Los Angeles Cty), alleges claims under California Civil Code § 3344 (requiring parental consent for the use of a minor’s persona in advertising), the California Constitution, Art. 1, section 1 (right of privacy), and California Business and Professions Code §§ 17203 and 17204 (unfair competition law). [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:35 pm
Super. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
[but] in a general sense, the principles of comment k relate to the negligence concepts.Toner, 732 P.2d at 310-11 (various citations omitted).Toner relied heavily on then-California law, as decided by intermediate California courts, especially Kearl v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:39 am
Fahmian, Super. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Super. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:58 pm
Ct. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Super. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Ct. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
Ct. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Ct. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:35 am
Ct. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:35 am
Ct. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Ct. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:47 am
Ct. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Ct. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 12:21 pm
Super. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Super. [read post]
