Search for: "California v. United States Environmental Protection Agency"
Results 381 - 400
of 556
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:06 pm
(LA Neighbors United v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 4:16 pm
Hart In Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
The most recent such case is the Third District’s published decision in Voices for Rural Living v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
Applying an agency theory, the panel concluded that Daimler AG had sufficient contacts with the state of California by virtue of the actions of its subsidiary Mercedes Benz USA to give California personal jurisdiction overthe German parent , even though Mercedes Benz USA had no involvement with the alleged facts in Argentina. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
Applying an agency theory, the panel concluded that Daimler AG had sufficient contacts with the state of California by virtue of the actions of its subsidiary Mercedes Benz USA to give California personal jurisdiction overthe German parent , even though Mercedes Benz USA had no involvement with the alleged facts in Argentina. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:01 am
In Metcalf v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
United States Forest Service, ___ F.3d ___, 2012 U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Northwest Environmental Defense Center (Granted )Docket: 11-347Issue(s): Whether the Ninth Circuit should have deferred to the Environmental Protection Agency’s longstanding position that channeled runoff from forest roads does not require a permit, and erred when it mandated that EPA regulate such runoff as industrial stormwater subject to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Northwest Environmental Defense Center (Granted )Docket: 11-347Issue(s): Whether the Ninth Circuit should have deferred to the Environmental Protection Agency’s longstanding position that channeled runoff from forest roads does not require a permit, and erred when it mandated that EPA regulate such runoff as industrial stormwater subject to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
The respondents then attempted to satisfy the judgment by attaching accounts in the United States held by (among others) Bank Melli. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Agency coordination in shared regulatory space. [read post]
