Search for: "Camp v. Howe" Results 381 - 400 of 1,371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by sydniemery
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
  So asks (correctly) "How much time and money should the juvenile justice system spend to 'chase' this $100" restitution award? [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And just as parade organizers can't be required to pay a security fee that's based on how controversial the parade's message is (Forsyth County v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
  In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe covers the order list for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:50 am by Amy Howe
The justices also denied review in Smyth v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:10 am by John Elwood
Here is how Boise frames the issue: Does the enforcement of generally applicable laws regulating public camping and sleeping constitute “cruel and unusual punishment” prohibited by the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution? [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm by sydniemery
Brown, Winning the Waiting Game: How Oklahoma Can Rectify the Discrepancy Between Its No-Impeachment Rule and Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
And in Part II, I recounted my experience waiting on the bar line for DHS v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:41 am by CJLF Staff
In 2000, the Eleventh Circuit held in Joel v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Seamus Hughes, Devorah Margolin
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]