Search for: "Carter v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2012, 8:52 am by admin
  The article also dismissed this claim as overly “ambitious” for a company that “trades at only eight cents per share on the lowly ‘pink sheets’ in the United States”. [read post]
United States, wherein the university barred interracial dating due to their religious beliefs. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:09 am by Susan Brenner
  In the United States,  cross-examination is considered an important way to test the truth of a statement. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am by Keith Gerver
 Carter then discusses how the United States remains the indispensable nation by discussing its contribution to the Libyan mission. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am by Dan Ernst
”Kristin Ahlberg, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “The Foreign Relation Series and Human Rights: Documenting the Carter Administration"Carl Ashley, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “Declassifying the History of U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Peter Margulies
In contrast, EO-3 does not assert that any country subject to its restrictions affirmatively encouraged inadmissible foreign nationals to enter the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), authorizing the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:07 pm
Which might start with a critique of the manner in which Judge O'Scannlain unhelpfully begins his opinion, with a first paragraph that reads (in its entirety): "We are called upon to decide whether an alien may be removed from the United States for having been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude as determined under federal immigration law. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:01 am by Eugene Volokh
On June 2, 2021, the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Maryland unsealed an indictment naming Mr. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Cody M. Poplin
Later, David Bosco expanded on Bellinger’s piece, examining the merit's of the U.S.'s concerns over the aggression amendments, and why it is increasingly difficult for the United States to prevent their adoption. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
If that placement is correct, then Hughes visited Roberts before Roberts cast his vote in Tipaldo; before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:46 am by Lawrence Solum
If that placement is correct, then Hughes visited Roberts before Roberts cast his vote in Tipaldo; before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 in United States v. [read post]