Search for: "Case v. Hatch"
Results 381 - 400
of 932
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2016, 3:00 am
By Dennis Crouch In the landmark case of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:57 am
By Dennis Crouch Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:29 am
Since this was a Hatch-Waxman Act case, the case was tried to judge and not a jury. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:29 am
Since this was a Hatch-Waxman Act case, the case was tried to judge and not a jury. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:07 pm
Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:10 am
Recently, in CCP Systems AG, v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:30 pm
The response, of course, being that they cannot completely shield their patents from any review - they will still be subject to federal court and the realm of Hatch-Waxman litigation (at least in this case). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court took a case relating to the Hatch-Waxman Act was Merck v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
Orrin Hatch suggested that all nine SCOTUS Justices disagreed with the way Sotomayor handled the Ricci case. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 9:48 am
See Teva Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 7:02 am
Pyett, and Gross v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:54 am
You remember the Branch Consultants v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
Save for whatever tactical interim application a party may be dreaming up, it is the Case Management Conference (CMC) that can be all important to a case. [read post]
24 May 2007, 12:49 pm
Calogero and Leclerc v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:30 am
Cephalon, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:15 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2009 decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am
Examining the Reasoning Behind the SCOTUS Ruling When the case was brought before the justices, they examined the policies of the FDCA and the modifications that had been made to it in 1984, called the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:31 am
Now a judge in Pennsylvania held in the case of Rogers v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 10:50 am
Remember back in 2021 when I “mused” about Dickson v. [read post]
