Search for: "Cash v. Cash" Results 381 - 400 of 8,530
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The trial court ruled in favor of Longview and imposed a constructive trust on the Karnes County property until 1776 Energy transferred that property to Longview. 1776 Energy then appealed the judgment and posted $25 million in cash with the trial court to suspend enforcement of the judgment. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The most striking example is provided by the balancing test announced in Mathews v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:11 am by Barry Barnett
” https://www.linkedin.com/posts/barry-barnett-8313014_findings-and-conclusions-in-us-v-american-activity-7066821377835626497-6QFM? [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 12:23 pm by Michael Oykhman
An example of colour of right in the context of a section 362 offence might be that you write out a cheque for a certain amount to give in exchange for the obtainment of some property and the cheque bounces due to insufficient funds, however, you genuinely believed, that when you wrote out or cashed the cheque, that the attributable funds were available. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 12:08 pm by Michael Oykhman
Call Now 1-866-939-5940Overview of the Offence  Section 362 of the Criminal Code reads as follows: False pretence or false statement 362 (1) Every one commits an offence who (a) by a false pretence, whether directly or through the medium of a contract obtained by a false pretence, obtains anything in respect of which the offence of theft may be committed or causes it to be delivered to another person; (b) obtains credit by a false pretence or by fraud; (c) knowingly makes or causes to be made,… [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:45 am
As Justice Feuer's opinion correctly holds, the rules t issue say that the assessor can "introduce new evidence of full cash value of a parcel of property at the hearing" with the sole caveat that if that full cash value is "a higher assessed value than he placed on the roll, he shall, at least 10 days prior to the hearing, inform the applicant of the higher assessed value and the evidence proposed to be introduced and he may thereafter introduce such… [read post]