Search for: "Chambers v. State of Texas"
Results 381 - 400
of 698
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm
EPA, 12-1268; Texas v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 7:57 am
Although Texas state courts generally enforce forum-selection clauses, the district court and the court of appeals refused to transfer the case. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:44 pm
The petitions of the day are: Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am
Furthermore, in 22 states one party now enjoys a veto-proof majority in both chambers. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:56 am
The Death Chamber at the Huntsville Unit in TexasThis post is straight from Texas, our most prolific death penalty state. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:39 pm
Tuesday, a panel of the 9th Circuit issued its opinion in Deere v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
App. 2013)); or Minnesota (Chambers v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Chambers. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:01 am
IANAL, but my personal view was that SB 187 did not provide enough discretion on sentencing to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 3:26 pm
Texas, No. 05-11-01407-CR (Tx. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:25 pm
For more, see The Texas Criminal Justice Coalition's list of bills to safely reduce incarceration in Texas. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am
Zoe Tillman of the Blog of Legal Times reports that Antoine Jones, the defendant in last Term’s GPS tracking case, United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
A similar due process analysis governed the case in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:45 am
"Reasonable suspicion" is not required under Texas law except for physical mobile tracking devices like those at issue in US v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm
A group of California vineyard operators will be represented in the case of Horne v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
A (Hypocritical) Rejection of Textualism Last week’s House vote may tell us that many conservative members of that chamber (and conservatives voted for the bill in much higher numbers than liberals) are somewhat hypocritical in their views on constitutional interpretation. [read post]
