Search for: "Chapel v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 471
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2011, 3:33 am
We’ll discuss their decision in State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 6:40 am
LEXIS 42130 (N OH, April 19, 2011), an Ohio federal district court dismissed Muslim inmates' complaint regarding the lack of Halal food and denial of use of the chapel for services on two occasions.In Eichler v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court, yesterday, in Sossamon v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:11 am
Petitioner Harvey Sossamon sought injunctive and monetary relief from the state of Texas under RLUIPA for prison policies that prohibited him from using the prison chapel... [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
I thoroughly appreciate the difficult position that Professor Cronon finds himself in, especially as I am a public official in the state of Florida, which has arguably the most exacting sunshine laws in the country (enshrined in our state constitution no less) and where one of the key state supreme court decisions enforcing the open meeting act concerned a dean search at my law school (Wood v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:32 am
The key case is Yarborough v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:51 pm
In September 2005, an investigator of juvenile crime for the Chapel Hill, N.C., Police Department, Joseph DiCostanzo, was looking into break-ins in two Chapel Hill homes. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:34 pm
” Lamb’s Chapel v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:22 am
FIELDSTON PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:33 am
., v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:00 am
In Lilly v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:31 am
In Mauwee v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:00 am
In Warren v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
The rights and the duties of the Standing Committee, except as provided in the Constitution and Canons of the General Convention, may be prescribed by the Canons of the respective Dioceses.ARTICLE V. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:32 pm
Similarly, Williamson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:39 pm
Supreme Court today heard oral arguments in Sossamon v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:33 pm
At 11 a.m. on Tuesday, the Court will hear one-hour of oral argument on that issue in Sossamon v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
She never argued that, because legacy preferences are hereditary, they presented a “suspect” classification that should be judged by the “strict scrutiny” standard under the amendment’s equal-protection clause.The district-court judge in the case, Rosenstock v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 12:02 pm
DiLoreto v. [read post]
