Search for: "Charles v. United States Government" Results 381 - 400 of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2014, 11:14 pm
“[I]n such case it is the law of [the state where the mortal blow is given] that is violated, and not the law of the state where death may happen to occur” (Stout v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 9:27 am by David Cosgrove
In 1919, Charles Ponzi, for whom the scheme would eventually be named, saw an opportunity to make money utilizing the unequal exchange rate between the United States and Spain, the latter’s currency one-sixth the value of the former. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:25 am by Amy Howe
” At Letters Blogatory, Charles Kotuby compares the Court’s recent decisions in Lozano v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Abbott, holding that states and local governments may use total population to draw legislative districts, comes from Howard Mintz of The Mercury News. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 11:51 am by Vanessa Sauter
Sarah Grant summarized Judge Cooper’s opinion on motion in limine in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  Once general principles of institutional structures are understood, it is possible to contextualize these insights within the realities of the American Republic--the general government, the administrative branches, inferior political units, and the residuary role of the people as ultimate sovereigns. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:00 am by Staley Smith
Charles Lister wrote on the implications of the recent outreach of Syrian Islamists to the United States and the serious issues that remain in the way of on-the-ground cooperation. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am by Gordon Ahl
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:39 pm by Kevin Johnson
The arguments The United States contends that, because the statute is ambiguous and the BIA’s interpretation is reasonable, that interpretation is entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The United States Department of Justice has decided that the company will not face charges. [read post]