Search for: "Clayton v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation.Ramos v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 11:23 pm
L.W. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 3:26 pm
Clayton. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:04 am
Clayton County, Georgia, 6-3) Blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to rescind deportation protections for undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 8:41 am
DBA Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 3:40 am
Clayton County, the United States Supreme Court held that treating individuals differently because of their transgender status violates Title VII's prohibition on sex discrimination. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 (1962)). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:45 pm
The House tried to block Adam Clayton Powell from taking his House seat on the grounds that he had engaged in financial impropriety. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
Little Rock Cardiology Clinic v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm
F.T.C., 440 U.S. 69, 80 (1979); United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am
” At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy writes that if the Supreme Court rules for the “faithless elector” in Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:20 am
Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:09 am
In Bostock v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:47 pm
Ohio 1993), aff’d 43 F.3d 1076 (6th Cir. 1995); and Vermont, Clayton v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:29 am
Clayton County, 140 S. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:30 pm
For example, here, the Court declined to apply the Clayton Antitrust Act standing rules from Associated General Contractors of California v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Bostock v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 11:58 am
” And we now have a president who is planning to follow the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
