Search for: "Coates v. Coates"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2010, 8:01 am
[Santa Clara v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:30 am
GigAcquisitions3, LLC and Laidlaw v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:30 am
GigAcquisitions3, LLC and Laidlaw v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:34 pm
” Coating Characterization “Information on the intended function of the coating,” “the materials used in the coating or its generation, bond method and bond strength between a coating and its substrate, and salient material or biochemical properties of the coating, including thickness, pore size, and overall volume of porous coatings. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm
; R. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Last week, CEH announced settlements with four of the companies for payments of $35,000 each, with the companies also agreeing to reduce the lead content in these products to less than 90 ppm of lead in surface coatings and 600 ppm in materials by March 1, 2010, reducing the material standard to between 200 and 300 ppm by next year. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:57 am
” [Mickey Kaus on New Republic report] Tags: antitrust, Florida, insurance, medical, Medicare, North Carolina, obstetrics Related posts White Coat Rants on “never events” (14) Update: Lawrence Poliner v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
Curious Theatre v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
However, the Court noted that the coating could be produced in many colours and, following the decision of the Federal Court in Smith, Kline & French Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:16 am
In AB Stable VIII LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
First, panelist Coates will explain how expert testimony shaped the Seattle Sonics economic impact lawsuit and provide an overview of the amicus brief filed by economists in support of petitioner in the American Needle v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:43 am
Dymatize Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 12:24 am
By way of example, in reaching a conclusion about the alleged likelihood of confusion between PLASTI DIP and FLEXIDIP, both for rubberized plastic coating products, the TTAB would ignore the different visual impressions of the marks and the different house marks on the packaging (Performix v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 2:50 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 6:02 am
Coates. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:37 am
Instead, it uses a process of ‘mingling’: automatically stirring and mixing the food to coat it in a thin film of oil, and cooking with a directed flow of heat.ObviousnessThe prior art was assessed as follows in the obviousness case:* Siu – Arnold J construed Siu as also disclosing a dry fryer. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:39 am
Zesty Paws LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:20 am
The court concluded that Brown lacks standing to challenge the landmark decision despite his strong interest in the matter.UPDATE: The full decision in Brown v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 10:08 am
The case is Sweeney v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 8:41 pm
Apotex Pty Ltd v AstraZeneca AB [2011] FCA 1520 (14 December 2011) Apotex Pty Ltd v AstraZeneca AB (No 2) [2012] FCA 142 (28 February 2012) Watson Pharma Pty Ltd v AstraZeneca AB [2012] FCA 200 (9 March 2012) Apotex Pty Ltd v AstraZeneca AB (No 3) [2012] FCA 265 (23 March 2012) AstraZenenca’s cholesterol drug CRESTOR will remain without generic competition in the Australian market for the foreseeable future, following a series of interlocutory decisions… [read post]
