Search for: "Com. v. Laws" Results 381 - 400 of 2,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2009, 3:41 am
Almost two years ago, in State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Objective injury v subjective harm  Once we move into subjective speech harms the law is loath to impose a duty. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Objective injury v subjective harm  Once we move into subjective speech harms the law is loath to impose a duty. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:18 am
Yesterday, the 8th District Court of Appeals announced its decision in City of Cleveland v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:19 am by Nassiri Law
Wage-and-Hour Class action, Feb. 17, 2015, By Margaret Harding, Law360.com More Blog Entries: Nikmanesh v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:30 am by gmlevine
Trademark law recognizes with some qualification that two parties can be entitled to use similar, even identical lexical strings where the concurrent user offers the public unrelated goods or services. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:03 am
Oregon on State v. [read post]