Search for: "Consolidated Plaintiffs " Results 381 - 400 of 5,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2024, 5:14 am by Donald Dinnie
Van Tonder v Road Accident Fund (1736/2020; 9773/2021) [2023] ZAWCHC 305 (1 December 2023) The court consolidated two matters against the Road Accident Fund, for payment of each plaintiff’s past medical and hospital expenses, which were rejected by the RAF due to the fact that both plaintiffs were members of private medical aid schemes, who had covered those medical expenses. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
" Ultimately several class actions were filed, which were later consolidated and lead counsel was appointed. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:18 am by Tom Smith
Plaintiffs’ lawyers plan to file a consolidated complaint in the Northern District of California next month, accusing the tech giants of making products that can cause eating disorders, anxiety and depression. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 6:04 am by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiffs SP Frederica, LLC; Peach Consolidated Properties, LLC; and Flash Foods, Inc. are businesses that are incorporated or organized, and maintain their principal places of business, in Georgia. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:00 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Bratton of the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas granted the tortfeasor Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of the court's prior denial of the tortfeasor's Motion to Sever the negligence claims asserted against him by the Plaintiff from the Plaintiff's UIM claims against the carrier.According to information received on this case, the case proceeded through the pleadings and discovery phases in a consolidated fashion. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:38 am
Tradewind Aviation, LLC (Negligence; "In this consolidated appeal, the defendant...appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following a jury trial in favor of the plaintiff...and the plaintiff cross appeals from the court's punitive damages award and its decision to reserve the question of statutory prejudgment interest for itself instead of the jury. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 5:52 am
Plaintiffs in a class action pending in Missouri, together with defense attorneys involve in class actions pending in Connecticut, Maine, Missouri, New Jersey and Vermont, moved the Judicial Panel to vacate its orders conditionally transferring the affected class action cases to the Northern District of California for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings; plaintiffs in the initially centralized actions joined in the motion, opposing transfer of… [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:51 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Now, after years of consolidated discovery and buildup the a test case is finally ready to presented to a jury in a federal courtroom in South Carolina. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 7:05 am
On July 24, Plaintiffs in 23 federal Yasmin/Yaz birth control lawsuits filed a motion with the Judicial Panel on MultiDistrict Litigation (JPML) requesting consolidation and/or coordination of at least 32 federal Yasmin/Yaz lawsuits. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 2:21 am
  Judge Illston denied the defendants’ motion in part, finding that the plaintiffs’ consolidated complaint had sufficiently alleged material misrepresentations with respect to the adequacy of PMI’s risk management practices and its reporting of its loss reserves. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:44 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The plaintiffs in these cases requested consolidation a few months ago. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 8:33 am by Daniel E. Cummins
I thank the prevailing Plaintiff's attorney in the Knott case, Attorney Doug Yazinski of the Pisanchyn Law Firm, for bringing the Knott decision to my attention. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:06 am
In the first two consolidated appeals, AC 36411 and AC 36412, the defendants...appeal from the trial court’s judgment confirming the arbitrator’s award of punitive damages to the plaintiff...claiming that the award was made in manifest disregard of the law. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 10:35 am by ADeStefano
"In a unanimous opinion, the First Department affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff's Labor Law § 240(1) claim, holding that plaintiff "was not protected by the statute since his duties as a flagman did not entail elevation-related risks"(citing Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co., 78 NY2d 509, 514 [1991]; Modeste v Mega Constr. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 12:24 pm
The court dismissed claims under certain state consumer statutes, as well as claims based on the laws of states in which no plaintiffs lived. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:42 am by Rushford & Bonotto, LLP
In our previous post, we began discussing recent development in the consolidated Toyota products liability cases. [read post]