Search for: "Consumer Class Cases Plaintiffs" Results 381 - 400 of 6,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2008, 4:19 am
In this case, plaintiff alleged he paid Time $29.51, but he received a book in exchange and the class action complaint [does] not allege he did not want the book, the book was unsatisfactory, or the book was worth less than what he paid for it. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:08 pm
Class Action Certification of Multi-State Class Action Alleging Consumer Protection Act Violations Improper because Reliance on Allegedly False/Deceptive Advertisements cannot be Presumed and Commonality not Present Seventh Circuit Holds Plaintiff filed a putative multi-state class action against Sears, Roebuck alleging false advertising under various state consumer protection statutes and individual claims for violations of… [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:02 am by Wystan Ackerman
He noted that “if substance is to prevail over form, and consumer class actions are not to be largely eviscerated, the Supreme Court will need to decide that a plaintiff’s request to proceed as a class representative pressing the real claims of those to be represented is a claim for relief that precludes a finding of mootness. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:02 am by Wystan Ackerman
He noted that “if substance is to prevail over form, and consumer class actions are not to be largely eviscerated, the Supreme Court will need to decide that a plaintiff’s request to proceed as a class representative pressing the real claims of those to be represented is a claim for relief that precludes a finding of mootness. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:02 am by Wystan Ackerman
He noted that “if substance is to prevail over form, and consumer class actions are not to be largely eviscerated, the Supreme Court will need to decide that a plaintiff’s request to proceed as a class representative pressing the real claims of those to be represented is a claim for relief that precludes a finding of mootness. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  Voigt proposes that a company’s voluntary efforts in providing refunds to customers in consumer litigation can, in an appropriate case, be a more efficient means of providing collective redress than a class action settlement, which a court should take into account in conducting the superiority analysis required under Rule 23. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 10:07 pm
" Had it not been for a class action, this could not have been accomplished.Over the years, consumer class actions have helped achieve similar vindication of Americans' legal rights in many different contexts. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:52 am by John G. Papianou
May 5, 2014), Plaintiffs filed a proposed class action against Sanofi Pasteur, Inc. and Vaxserve, Inc., alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:48 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
If the case makes it to the Ninth Circuit Court, there’s a chance the federal court will enforce the arbitration agreement, in which case each plaintiff will have to pursue their claims individually and abandon the class action. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Ct., 40 Cal. 4th 360 (2007), a leading California case concerning prospective class member contact information. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:34 am by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
You can click here to see a description of the some of the many individual and class-action consumer cases our Chicago consumer lawyers have handled. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:00 pm by Scott Tillett
The class action case against Bayer for false advertising in connection with its Men’s vitamins has been settled. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Article III standing for injunctive relief existed, despite the named plaintiff’s unwillingness to buy again, because the product was still on sale and, “[i]f defendant’s theory were to be accepted, it would effectively bar injunctive classes in consumer deception cases …. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:18 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Case Background Plaintiff brought a nationwide class action seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief against the distributor of a dietary supplements. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:39 am
  The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred the federal cases to the Central District of Illinois for consolidated pretrial proceedings where the plaintiffs moved to certify a class that would cover IKO’s sales in eight states since 1979. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:07 pm
The district court concluded that common issues did not predominate because of the individual inquiries inherent in determining reliance: “The district court refused to certify a class in this case because it determined that Hawaii’s consumer protection laws require individualized reliance showings. [read post]