Search for: "Cox v. Amend" Results 381 - 400 of 563
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” There’s a certain attraction to an absolutist First Amendment: “No law” means no law.1 But that position is not very helpful, since the Amendment doesn’t define “freedom of speech” or freedom of the press. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts On 7 December 2011 Mr Justice Eady gave judgment in the case of McKeown v Attheraces Ltd [2011] EWHC 3232 (QB), giving the defendant permission to amend, ordering trial by judge alone and refusing an application for trial of a preliminary issue. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm by Zachary Spilman
In Weymouth, Judge Cox, writing for the court, explained: To summarize our holdings on the law of lesser-included offenses and multiplicity: in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-6602; Cox v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In Obsidian Finance v Cox (23 August 2011), the court ruled in favour of blogger Crystal Cox, who ran the website obsidianfinancesucks.com, where she published a number of serious and damaging statements about a bankruptcy trustee. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
  This fee schedule, which amends 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:06 am by J
Tingdene Holiday Parks Ltd v Cox and others [2011] UKUT 310 (LC)By s.21B, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, a demand for the payment of service charges must be “accompanied” by a summary of rights and obligations of tenants in relation to the same. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:06 am by J
Tingdene Holiday Parks Ltd v Cox and others [2011] UKUT 310 (LC)By s.21B, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, a demand for the payment of service charges must be “accompanied” by a summary of rights and obligations of tenants in relation to the same. [read post]