Search for: "Cox v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 7:43 am
Defense in a recent trip-and-fall premises liability lawsuit argued a defect in a doorway that reportedly caused a patron to trip was not unreasonably dangerous, and further pointed to a so-called "categorical exemption" regarding entryway thresholds under state law. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 6:09 am
"The case is Cox v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:41 am
Veterans Land Board of the State of Texas (VLB), et al., No. 09? [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
City of New York, 779 F.3d 167, [quoting Cox v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
City of New York, 779 F.3d 167, [quoting Cox v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
” Blum v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 2:11 pm
After its recent opinion in State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:32 am
Cox & Jerome C. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
Cox (that was summarily affirmed by the Supreme Court) seemed to eliminate a safe harbor previously thought to have been granted to state legislators under one person, one vote. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
See Davis & Cox v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:24 am
The second case was Cox v NAP Constr. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 2:02 pm
Cox Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitABORTION LAW HELD UNCONSTITUTIONALBOYCE F. [read post]
25 May 2007, 8:50 am
However, in Cox v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:16 pm
Similar to its federal counterpart, Mississippi Rule of Evidence 803(4) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations,... [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:08 pm
The appeals court agreed with the Michigan attorney general, Republican Mike Cox, who said in a March 2005 opinion that same-sex benefits are not allowed in a state that does not recognize same-sex unions.Thanks to How Appealing, here is the Michigan opinion in National Pride v. [read post]