Search for: "Cox v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2015, 6:17 am
Chevron Corp ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
City of New York, 779 F.3d 167, [quoting Cox v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
City of New York, 779 F.3d 167, [quoting Cox v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:24 am
The second case was Cox v NAP Constr. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
See Davis & Cox v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:08 pm
The appeals court agreed with the Michigan attorney general, Republican Mike Cox, who said in a March 2005 opinion that same-sex benefits are not allowed in a state that does not recognize same-sex unions.Thanks to How Appealing, here is the Michigan opinion in National Pride v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
Cox (that was summarily affirmed by the Supreme Court) seemed to eliminate a safe harbor previously thought to have been granted to state legislators under one person, one vote. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
In Sandra Rada v Cox Enterprises Inc as Plan Administrator & AETNA Life Insurance Company as Claims Administrator, the plaintiff Sandra Rada alleged that AETNA Life had not provided the plaintiff with a full and fair review of her claim for long term disability (LTD) benefits and thus seek the Court to review Aetna Life's decision under a de novo standard. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 2:02 pm
Cox Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitABORTION LAW HELD UNCONSTITUTIONALBOYCE F. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:48 am
Cox Court Denies Restraining Order Against Ex-Boyfriend Who Threatened to Post Revenge Porn — EC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:43 pm
Yesterday, the Missouri Supreme Court in Watts v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:16 pm
Similar to its federal counterpart, Mississippi Rule of Evidence 803(4) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations,... [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:59 am
Cox (In re Cox), 338 F.3d 1238, 1241 (11th Cir. 2003) (quoting Brunner v. [read post]