Search for: "Cox v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 7:43 am
Defense in a recent trip-and-fall premises liability lawsuit argued a defect in a doorway that reportedly caused a patron to trip was not unreasonably dangerous, and further pointed to a so-called "categorical exemption" regarding entryway thresholds under state law. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 6:17 am
Chevron Corp ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:24 am
The second case was Cox v NAP Constr. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
See Davis & Cox v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:08 pm
The appeals court agreed with the Michigan attorney general, Republican Mike Cox, who said in a March 2005 opinion that same-sex benefits are not allowed in a state that does not recognize same-sex unions.Thanks to How Appealing, here is the Michigan opinion in National Pride v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
at 128, citing Fetahu v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
Cox (that was summarily affirmed by the Supreme Court) seemed to eliminate a safe harbor previously thought to have been granted to state legislators under one person, one vote. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
In Sandra Rada v Cox Enterprises Inc as Plan Administrator & AETNA Life Insurance Company as Claims Administrator, the plaintiff Sandra Rada alleged that AETNA Life had not provided the plaintiff with a full and fair review of her claim for long term disability (LTD) benefits and thus seek the Court to review Aetna Life's decision under a de novo standard. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 2:02 pm
Cox Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitABORTION LAW HELD UNCONSTITUTIONALBOYCE F. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:48 am
Cox Court Denies Restraining Order Against Ex-Boyfriend Who Threatened to Post Revenge Porn — EC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:43 pm
Yesterday, the Missouri Supreme Court in Watts v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:59 am
Cox (In re Cox), 338 F.3d 1238, 1241 (11th Cir. 2003) (quoting Brunner v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:16 pm
Similar to its federal counterpart, Mississippi Rule of Evidence 803(4) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations,... [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 8:21 pm
In their 2006 decision of AFSCME v. [read post]