Search for: "Creative Marketing v. AT&T"
Results 381 - 400
of 987
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am
Garcia v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
Kimberly also noted that lawyers need to be creative and nimble, which is not easily identifiable in hiring situations. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
Creative Pipe, Inc. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am
The appeals court said in a ruling last week: "Whether the MMA applies to and pre-empts Flo & Eddie's claims, as Flo & Eddie note, cannot be answered on the record before us. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
Examples are US v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm
There have also been complaints where creators have tried to NFT their own creativity but by doing so have breached a contract. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:01 am
Archer claims that his novel Not a Penny More, Not a Penny Less was turned into the 2011 romantic comedy hit Ladies v Ricky Bahl, and that Archer's Kane & Abel became the film Khudgarz. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 12:37 pm
Lunney: are these recent v. historical? [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:13 pm
See Doe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm
Fair return for author’s creative labor, but ultimate aim is stimulate creativity for the public good. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Sprigman: Came up in Apple v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm
Past week: US v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
(UK Channel Management Ltd v E! [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:07 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) Conference on creative content online: What financial models for creative content online? [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
If we don’t restrict reimportation, we should accept a single price and a loss of ability to fund R&D. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar &;amp; Co &;amp; Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:31 am
2 and 3 don't tell us very much - that the original work is an ad, but also a creative work, points in no particular direction, especially since appropriation art is generally going to appropriate creative works; likewise the fact that Prince copied the whole work doesn't add much to 1 and 4. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85… [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
But socially valuable innovations can be difficult to marketize/commodify. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
Prince v. [read post]
