Search for: "Creeks v. Creeks" Results 381 - 400 of 1,331
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2019, 1:18 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Legislation Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/116_uslegislation.htmlThe following were added: H.R.1514: To sever United States Government relations with the Creek Nation of Oklahoma until such time as the Creek Nation of Oklahoma restores full Tribal citizenship to the Creek Freedman disenfranchised in the October 6, 1979, Creek Nation vote and fulfills all its treaty obligations with the Government of the United States, and for other… [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:43 am by scanner1
Marriage of Brockington DA 18-0353 2019 MT 59N Civil – Domestic Relations Soup Creek v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 8:25 pm by Sme
 Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (10th Cir., January 29, 2019) (Granting the Board's application for enforcement of 2018 decision holding the Buyers were nonmanagerial employees representable by the union)Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety and Disease*Deardorff v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 5:25 pm by Joseph Stacey
This is exactly what happened when Dakota Creek Industries, a 44-year-old family owned shipbuilding company in Anacortes, Washington, self-reported that the F/V AMERICA’S FINEST had indeed exceeded that limit. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Murphy, the case argued in November addressing whether the area of eastern Oklahoma that was once a Creek Nation Indian reservation remains so (meaning that the state of Oklahoma cannot assert criminal jurisdiction over members of the nation there). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm by MOTP
UPDATE: Texas Supreme Court denied review 5/24/2019 CLAIM-FRACTURING CUM APPELLATE GALORE Natgasoline LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 10:06 pm by Jeff Gittins
The Utah Court of Appeal recently issued its decision in the case of Salt Lake City Corporation v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 7:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Biegalski (Doctrine of Claim Preclusion; State Taxation; Utilities)Guardado v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:54 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law360, Edward Zelinsky writes that the justices’ comments during oral argument in Dawson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 2:52 pm by Unknown
Biegalski (Doctrine of Claim Preclusion; State Taxation; Utilities)Guardado v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:59 pm by Ronald Mann
Now that the justices have had a few days to consider last week’s oral argument in Carpenter v Murphy, it appears that they are looking for creative ways to resolve the dispute. [read post]