Search for: "Crew v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:44 am
State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:10 am
Bernstein, the federal government will weigh in on whether the Airline Deregulation Act trumps mandatory state-law breaks for flight crews, while the question in California Trucking Association v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am
United States and Thole v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:29 am
(See Milkovich v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 9:04 am
Newsom v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:41 am
Steneken v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
This two-decade trend started in 1999 with United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
The crew of the OLGA, headed by Captain Bernard Calot, was small. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Lipsey v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:53 am
Blount, Informed consent v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:23 pm
Just a few of the reasons offered by crew members: Continue reading [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 9:58 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 2:31 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down its eagerly awaited judgment in Case C-438/05 International Transport Workers' Federation & The Finnish Seamen's Union v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:31 pm
Holding that the failure to provide adequate space for the crew to perform their work supported negligence, the Ninth Circuit reversed the trial court and stated: “Ribitzki stated in his deposition that the pit room was an unsafe place because it provided insufficient space for him to perform his assigned task. . . [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 9:18 am
Ganpat v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
The case otherwise strikes me as a commonsense application of the logic of CREW v. [read post]
