Search for: "DARE v. STATE" Results 381 - 400 of 738
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2013, 3:06 pm
I'm probably going to get hammered for this (because how dare I an an opinion of my own which does not follow the opinion of any political group) but after reading the New Mexico Supreme Court's opinion in Elane Photography, LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Instead, states responded with a swift and decisive showing of support for capital punishment. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 12:00 am by Rumpole
In Geter v, State, 38 FLW D1405 (3rd DCA June 26, 2013) a remarkable thing occurred: the 3rd DCA denied, en banc (legally: the whole bunch), Geter's request to apply retroactively the US Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 6:33 am
This Kat will not dare to speak out on the practical implications of the Myriad ruling. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:00 pm by Steve Vladeck
Reasonable people can certainly disagree about the normative desirability (and, I dare say, legality) of the degree of governmental surveillance that is now underway. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
DIFFUSION AN INTERNATIONAL, INTERDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON COMPARATIVE LAW       Co-Sponsored by the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law and Juris Diversitas 3 & 4 June 2013 Lausanne, Switzerland  [For additional information, contact Marie Papeil at marie.papeil@isdc-dfjp.unil.ch ] Monday, June 3, 2013 8:30-9:30              Registration, Coffee … [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-884, in which the Heart of Dixie dares to maintain its rights . . . to criminalize the act of concealing, harboring, encouraging to remain, or transporting aliens present in the United States “in violation of federal law. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm by John Dean
” Following this line of reasoning, the High Court later stated in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am by John Dean
” Following this line of reasoning, the High Court later stated in U.S. v. [read post]