Search for: "DOES 1-100, exclusive" Results 381 - 400 of 1,950
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2021, 1:25 am by Florian Mueller
Plaintiff/Movant can avert enforcement by Defendant [again, this relates to litigation costs] by providing collateral to the amount of 100% of the amount enforceable under this judgment, unless Defendant provides, prior to enforcement, security to the amount of 100% of the amount to be collected.Factual BackgroundThis dispute between the parties is about the legality of a cooperation between Defendant [Google] and the [German] Federal Government, pursuant to which content of the… [read post]
The Bill allows taxpayers to fully and immediately expense 100% of the cost of qualified property acquired and placed in service after September 7, 2017 and before January 1, 2023, and expands property that is eligible. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 11:33 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
This does not not mean that one can’t still file a mesothelioma lawsuit after diagnosis with the deadly disease that was caused virtually exclusively by the Untied States government, but it does mean that the Department of Defense or any other branch of the Untied States government will probably not be a defendant. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 7:32 pm
  (HT: IPDragon)Counterfeiting does not take a vacation! [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:44 am by BARBRI
LEARN TO BE AVERAGE 50 Years, 100 Bar Exams: Our Exclusive U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 12:43 pm by Geoffrey Manne
So does the Intel/AMD settlement raise issues under Section 1? [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:41 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 1993), where the Second Circuit affirmed the district court's exclusion of expert testimony regarding defendant's supposed `dependent personality disorder. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
 ___________BILL NUMBER: AB 2525 INTRODUCED BILL TEXTINTRODUCED BY Assembly Members Bonta and Levine FEBRUARY 21, 2014 An act to amend Sections 12311 and 25100 of, to amend the headingof Title 2.6 (commencing with Section 17701.01) of, to add theheading of Division 1 (commencing with Section 17701.01) to, and toadd Division 2 (commencing with Section 17801.01) to, Title 2.6 of,the Corporations Code, relating to worker cooperative companies. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Cir. rules have made royalties supercompensatory through various rules.Seems backwards for three reasons. (1) Greater notice failures exist in IP. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:33 am by Susan Brenner
Two of the hallmarks of traditional property are exclusivity. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 4:11 am by Diane Tweedlie
The examining division, enlarged by a legal member, rectified the decision under appeal pursuant to Article 109(1) EPC. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 11:41 am by Brett Holubeck
As the Department of Labor explains: The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) generally covers employers with 100 or more employees, not counting those who have worked less than six months in the last 12 months and those who work less than 20 hours per week, or those employers with 100 or more employees, including part-time workers, who in the aggregate work at least 4,000 hours per week, exclusive of overtime.WARN protects workers, their families, and… [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:59 am by Broc Romanek
This is supported by this excerpt from the SEC’s adopting release in 2000: Rule 100(b)(1) enumerates four categories of persons to whom selective disclosure may not be made absent a specified exclusion. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 6:23 am by Florian Mueller
§ 1 Sherman Act then comes into play with respect to contract terms Apple and Google impose on third parties. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 3:44 pm by Judith Fiorini
  The gross income exclusion provided under Code Section 139 does not apply, however, to payments that are in the nature of income replacement, e.g. payments for lost wages. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:34 pm by Amanda L. Wait and Matthew W. Modell
Chiefly, the court said that Amazon Business (1) lacks RFP experience; (2) has no commitment to guaranteed pricing; (3) lacks the ability to control third-party price and delivery; (4) does not have the ability to provide customer-specific pricing; (5) lacks dedicated customer service agents for large business customers; (6) does not do desktop delivery; (7) does not provide detailed utilization and invoice reports; and (8) lacks product variety and breadth. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm by admin
The OSHA ETS also does not apply to the following employees of covered employers: Employees who do not report to a workplace where other individuals are present; Employees while working from home; and Employees who work exclusively outdoors. [read post]